Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vorpahl v. Labe et al
as 4:2023cv06557
Plaintiff:
Larry Vorpahl
Defendant:
James P Labe, Christopher M. Mathieu, Sajal K. Srivastava and others
Mathieu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv08772
Plaintiff:
Martine Mathieu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sorrell v. Mendez
as 2:2023cv02225
Plaintiff:
Mathieu Lance Sorrell and Mathieu Sorrell
Defendant:
T Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance v. Monlyn-Mathieu
as 1:2023cv07987
Plaintiff:
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance
Defendant:
Latoyia Monlyn-Mathieu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Mathieu v. Cazi et al
as 1:2023cv08663
Plaintiff:
James Mathieu
Defendant:
Tamara Cazi and County of Queens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
David Jackson-Mackay v. Warden, FCI Coleman Low, et al
as 23-13115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. JACKSON-MACKAY
Defendant / Appellee:
FCI COLEMAN LOW WARDEN, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, KRISTIE MATHIEU and others
Jackson-Mackay v. Gunther et al
as 5:2023cv00555
Plaintiff:
David A Jackson-Mackay
Defendant:
Warden Jason Gunther, Elizabeth Ortiz, Kristie Mathieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 m Violation of Prov. of Subchpt.VI (Electronic Fund Transfers)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
