Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Cooke-Bates v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv20020
Plaintiff:
Tonji L. Cooke-Bates
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. , Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brooks v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2010cv00594
Petitioner:
Michael E. Brooks
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BCS Insurancce Company v. Everett Yat-Wai Woo
as 2:2010cv07896
Plaintiff:
BCS Insurancce Company
Unknown:
Michael L Brooks and Jeremy D Kerman
Defendant:
Everett Yat-Wai Woo
Michael Brooks v. City of Aurora, Illinois, et al
as 10-3265
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS, a municipal corporation, DOUGLAS RASHKOW, #126 City of Aurora Police Officers, GEORGE LILL, #128 and others
BROOKS v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2010cv03264
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. BROOKS
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, LARRY GLOVER, N.S.P. CLASS DTP HEAD JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooke-Bates v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00261
Plaintiff:
Tonji L. Cooke-Bates
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. , Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Estate of Dominic Petrolino by Robert Brooks v. Brooks et al
as 2:2009cv04196
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dominic Petrolino by Robert Brooks
Defendant:
Michael D. Brooks, David Brooks and Lorraine Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael W. Brooks v. A.o. Smith, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-79280
Defendant:
A.o. Smith
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Brooks
Brooks v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2009cv01250
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Brooks
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Brooks v. City Of Aurora et al
as 1:2009cv04144
Plaintiff:
Michael A Brooks and Michael A Brooks
Defendant:
City Of Aurora, P.O. Rashkow, P.O. Lill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
