Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Eric L Brown v. Morgan Sally et al
as 5:2012cv00089
Plaintiff:
Eric L Brown
Defendant:
Richard Butcher, V Chakmakian, J Chudy and others
Eric L Brown v. Nathan Williams et al
as 5:2011cv02046
Plaintiff:
Eric L Brown
Defendant:
Richard Butcher, V Chakmakian, J Chudy and others
Williams et al v. THC Kentucky Coal Venture I LLC. et al
as 7:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams and Nathan Williams
Defendant:
THC Kentucky Coal Venture I LLC. and Phaedra Spradlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fehl-Haber v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2011cv00004
Petitioner:
Nathan William Fehl-Haber
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peebles et al v. The City of Union Springs, Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv01079
Plaintiff:
Antjuan Peebles and Kimberly Ellis
Defendant:
The City of Union Springs, Alabama and Nathan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Berg et al
as 0:2010cv04638
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Susan Marie Berg, Richard Arthur Berg and Nathan William Berg
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00080
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Williams v. Louisiana State Penitentiary
as 5:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv08036
Plaintiff:
Nathan Williams
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
