Cases 71 - 80 of 6,701
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 17.697 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
17.697 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, James W. Granbery, James Treanor Granbery, III and others
Counter Defendant:
Tianda Tavares
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 1.669 Acres in Houston County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
1.669 Acres in Houston County, Tennessee and Donald L. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Perkins v. PNC Bank
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Perkins et al
as 1:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Sergeant Miles Perkins, Sergeant Steven Fleshman, Sergeant Nicholas Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Monte et al
as 2:2024cv10950
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander Smith
Defendant:
Monte, Perkins, John Doe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Spears v. Perkins
as 24-2276
Petitioner:
MARCUS ISAIAH SPEARS
Respondent:
JEFFEREY PERKINS, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
