Cases 71 - 80 of 1,120
Puckett,et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 1:2023cv01143
Defendant:
National Basketball Association, Ain Jeem, Inc., Chris Stavro and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Puckett and Marcella Puckett
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PS) Harrell v. Puckett et al
as 2:2023cv01448
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Harrell
Defendant:
Robert Puckett, Sr., Michele Hanson, Melissa Tulledo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tangee Puckett v. David Kim
as 23-12265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TANGEE PUCKETT
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID KIM
Ain Jeem, Inc. v. Carl Puckett, Jr., et al
as 23-12267
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AIN JEEM, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
CARL ELLEN PUCKETT, JR.
Claimant:
MARCELLA ANDERSON PUCKETT
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Puckett v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01889
Plaintiff:
Jim Puckett
Defendant:
DAVOL,INC./C.R. BARD, INC. and Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Puckett v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq01979
Plaintiff:
Wayne Puckett
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Weber v. Lereaux et al
as 2:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Weber
Defendant:
John Lereaux, Jeremy Puckett and Brett Exnicious
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puckett v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01884
Plaintiff:
Eric Puckett
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PC) Nugent v. Sargent et al
as 2:2023cv01017
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Nugent
Defendant:
- Sargent, Hueng, Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
