Cases 71 - 80 of 100
SULLIVAN v. ROYAL CARRIBBEAN CRUISE LTD.
as 1:2026cv27370
Defendant:
ROYAL CARRIBBEAN CRUISE LTD., d/b/a The Royal Caribbean Group, The Royal Caribbean Group, CARLOS EDUARDO OLLARVES RAMOS, MD and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08610
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05301
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Cole v. Supt Division 9 et al
as 1:2026cv12696
Plaintiff:
Patrick U Cole, III
Defendant:
Supt Division 9, Div 9 Watch Commander A. Parker, Div 9 Sergeant M. Mochochi and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Paulino (Brito)
as 26-2942
Defendant:
JUAN EFREN PAULINO, JUAN MOISES PEREZ MENDEZ, EUSEBIO PERALTA BAUTISTA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Noel Davila v. US
as 26-7113
Plaintiff:
NOEL DAVILA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN R. RAMOS, MRS. RICHARDSON, Medical Administrator and others
Ramos v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 7:2026cv00505
Plaintiff:
Consuelo Carmen Ramos
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hernandez Ramos v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2026cv06659
Plaintiff:
Graciela Del Carmen Hernandez Ramos
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
