Cases 71 - 80 of 1,221
Ruffin v. Bergeron et al
as 2:2023cv03439
Plaintiff:
Lee Adonijah Ruffin
Defendant:
Steve Bergeron, Rhonda Ledet and S Schwausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney RuffinIn re: Rodney Ruffin
as 23-5717
Petitioner:
In re: RODNEY JAMES RUFFIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Albert Ruffin v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03946
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ruffin (PS) v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2023cv02025
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval and Attorney General of the State of Coloado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Christensen
as 4:2023cv01297
Petitioner:
Anthony Ravon Ruffin
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruffin v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv01289
Petitioner:
Anthony Ravon Ruffin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Love v. Love et al
as 1:2023cv03259
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Love
Defendant:
Shirley Ann Love, Crystal Love, Malcolm Winston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morales
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, John Doe and Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
