Cases 71 - 80 of 1,059
Smith v. State of Illinois
as 3:2023cv00737
Petitioner:
Eric S Smith
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Kendall S. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Director I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Eric S. Smith
Defendant:
Director I.D.O.C., Anthony Wills and Rob Jeffries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Braley v. Hicks et al
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
R. Hicks, Lt. D. Crane, S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 7:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Pena
Defendant:
Employer's and Employee's of The Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Bryan Collier, Jimmy S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Gibson et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Defendant:
Kristen Gibson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Smith
as 23-10053
Petitioner / Appellant:
Royal Douglas Robinson
Respondent / Appellee:
Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
AMANDA S SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06024
Plaintiff:
Mozell S. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
