Cases 71 - 80 of 113
JAMES v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE S JAMES
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Crawford v. Hennessey et al
as 1:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Gary Crawford
Defendant:
Ryon Hennessey, Brandon Deon Butler, Clinton W Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Dydzak v. Tani Cantil-Sakauye, et al
as 12-56960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, JOYCE L. KENNARD, MARVIN R. BAXTER and others
Horace v. Blevins et al
as 7:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lynell Horace
Defendant:
Dolores Thornton and Lisa S James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. James et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Danny Duffy
Defendant:
Lisa S James, Eddie C. Williams, Angela N. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE S. JAMES and MARILYN JAMES
Defendant:
MARYBETH FOLEY and JOHN FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fernando Guizar v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 12-15001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO GUIZAR
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, E. ALAMEIDA, Jr., G. HARRIS and others
Shawn Nelson v. Officer Felder
as 11-7690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN T. NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER FELDER, M. AIKEN, Officer, OFFICER KING and others
Defendant:
ORANGEBURG COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and ORANGEBURG COUNTY DETENTION MEDICAL STAFF
Morrow et al v. Oklahoma Investigative Group
as 4:2011cv00683
Plaintiff:
Tami S Morrow , Heath S James and Sandra K Fuller
Defendant:
Oklahoma Investigative Group
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
James et al v. Harlingen Family Dentistry, Series, PLLC et al
as 7:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Haydn J. James , Mary L. James and Katrina S. James
Defendant:
Harlingen Family Dentistry, Series PLLC and Juan D. Villareal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
