Cases 71 - 80 of 110
USA v. Dioni Santiago-Rodriguez
as 14-3960
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DIONI SANTIAGO-RODRIGUEZ
United States of America v. Castro (Brito)
as 14-2742
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eddie Alphonso Castro, AKA Braulio Duarte Muriel, Santiago Rodriguez, AKA Chago and Juan M. Dominguez
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Aramis Brito
USA v. Santiago Rodriguez
as 14-40715
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Santiago W. Rodriguez, also known as Santiago Woody Rodriguez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Santiago Rodriguez-Jaime
as 14-50165
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ-JAMES, also known as Santiago Benitez-Jaimes
Rodriguez v. Immigration and Custom Enforcement
as 5:2014cv00013
Petitioner:
Alonso Santiago Rodriguez
Respondent:
Immigration and Custom Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ESTATE OF DANIEL SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ et al v. JANE DOES 1-10 et al
as 3:2013cv07744
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF DANIEL SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ , JOSE A. MENDEZ , JENSEN DAXEL SANTIAGO JIMENEZ and others
Defendant:
JANE DOES 1-10, 5 POINTS TIRE & AUTO REPAIR, CAMPBELL HAUSFELD CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv12721
Plaintiff:
Sonia Santiago Rodriguez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as WVS/2:13-cv-12721
Plaintiff:
Sonia Santiago Rodriguez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
