Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Gebhart v. Fuschino
as 3:2015cv01687
Plaintiff:
Steven Douglas Gebhart
Defendant:
Richard Fuschino, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. F/V Panther, Inc.
as 1:2015cv13083
Plaintiff:
Steven Douglas
Defendant:
F/V Panther, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. General Motors L L C
as 1:2015cv03272
Plaintiff:
James Williams and Steven Douglas Williams
Defendant:
General Motors L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. General Motors L L C
as 5:2015cv01070
Plaintiff:
James Williams and Steven Douglas Williams
Defendant:
General Motors L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gebhart v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2015cv00136
Petitioner:
Steven Douglas Gebhart
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Common Pleas of York County and Northern York Regional Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wimsatt v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Steven Douglas Wimsatt
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. , Kroger Limited Partnership I , Kayla Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Knecht v. Knecht et al
as 9:2014cv81020
Plaintiff:
Janice Edwards Knecht
Defendant:
Michael Carrington Knecht, Troy Klien, Kalman Gerb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 6:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Gates , Gloria Gates , Mima Austin and others
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Edwards Knecht v. Daversa et al
as 9:2013cv81139
Plaintiff:
Janice Edwards Knecht
Defendant:
Jeff Daversa, Daversa & Martyn, P.A., & Attorneys Title, Southeast Guarantee & Title and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOUGLAS v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01351
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., VANCE RAHAM and RICHARD TANNER
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
