Cases 71 - 80 of 99
Lee v. MDOC et al
as 5:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jesus Garcia Lee
Defendant:
MDOC, MTC "WCCF, Frank Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darby v. Major et al
as 0:2015cv00529
Plaintiff:
Derrick Darby
Defendant:
Simon Major, Daryl F McGhaney and Staff Sgt James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Major v. James et al
as 5:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
Matthew Major
Defendant:
Sgt James, Sgt Sweat and Ofc Blakely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Major et al
as 1:2014cv04666
Plaintiff:
Mario Antwan Lloyd
Defendant:
Simon Major, Daryl McGhaney, Theresa Ray-Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Fontana v. City of Auburn, et al
as 14-35784
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL FONTANA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AUBURN, SGT. JAMES NORDENGER, OFFICER BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Hairfield-Ulsch v. Montgomery County Police Department et al.
as 8:2014cv02418
Plaintiff:
Charles Tyler Hairfield-Ulsch
Defendant:
Montgomery County Police Department , Officer Patrick Skiba , Officer Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PUSTOVRH v. SPINGOLA et al
as 2:2014cv00726
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PUSTOVRH
Defendant:
SGT. JAMES SPINGOLA, BOROUGH OF CANONSBURG and CANONSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Norfolk Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Whitaker
Defendant:
Norfolk Sheriff's Office, Sheriff McCabe, Lt. Col. Borom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv02603
Defendant:
City of New York, Sgt. James Grillo, John and Jane Doe 1 through 3 and others
Plaintiff:
John Willis, Phillip Willis and Shandee Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sorodsky et al v. US Attorney et al
as 1:2012cv04420
Defendant:
Justice Betsy Barros, Ellen Bieben, Anthony Bocola and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sorodsky and Michail Sorodsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
