Cases 71 - 80 of 1,478
Darryl Sanders v. Truist Bank
as 21-5378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL C. SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST BANK, dba SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Eleus Brown v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv00843
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eleus Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 1:2021at00580
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eleus Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Nealy v. SunTrust Bank, et al
as 21-11358
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK and SUNTRUST BANK, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY NEALY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sharpe v. SunTrust Bank
as 3:2021cv00236
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank
Plaintiff:
Sharpe Tonia and Tonia Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flordeliza Hawkins v. Court of Common Pleas
as 21-1167
Defendant / Appellee:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ANDERSON SOUTH CAROLINA, SUNTRUST BANK and JOSEPH PARTAIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FLORDELIZA A. HAWKINS
Michael Sherman, et al v. Shirley Sherrod, et al
as 21-1246
Intervenor / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK, nka Truist Bank and SUNTRUST INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D., P.C., a Michigan professional corporation and SHIRLEY T. SHERROD, M.D.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, D.O., P.C., dba Physician Eye Care Associates of Garden City and MICHAEL S. SHERMAN, D.O.
Truist Bank v. The Stache Company, LLC et al (TV1)
as 1:2021cv00023
Defendant:
JASON T JONES, THE STACHE COMPANY, LLC, WILLIAM TRAVIS GRIFFITH and others
Plaintiff:
TRUIST BANK, successor-in-interest to SUNTRUST BANK and Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
