Cases 71 - 80 of 207
Vause v. U.S. Xpress, Inc
as 4:2019cv01617
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc
Plaintiff:
Thomas Vick Vause
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lanata v. Greendahl et al
as 2:2019cv09823
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., Robert Greendahl and others
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Lanata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinoco-Herrera v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01813
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Tinoco-Herrera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawk v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 3:2019cv00164
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry C Hawk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
U.S. Xpress, Inc. v. Infinito, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00070
Defendant:
Infinito, Inc. and Simon Gomez
Plaintiff:
U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Beaver et al
as 3:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Robby Beaver, U.S. Xpress, Inc. and U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tammie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Green v. U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00092
Defendant:
U.S. XPRESS, INC., U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC., JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
APRIL GREEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hippler v. Bramble et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., Benjamin J. Bramble and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wayne Hippler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley v. Mountain Lake Risk et al
as 6:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Mountain Lake Risk, U.S. Xpress, Inc. and U S Xpress Inc
Plaintiff:
George Fiorucci and Wilfred Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
