Cases 71 - 80 of 36,285
ARAGON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. HETERO LABS LIMITED UNIT V et al
as 2:2024cv06784
Plaintiff:
ARAGON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC. and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant:
HETERO LABS LIMITED UNIT V and HETERO USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc.
as 24-1916
Appellant:
ROKU, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
ACKER et al v. UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
as 2:2024cv02468
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ACKER, MICHAEL AMENDOLA, AIDEN ANKLI and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Moses v. Central State University et al
as 2:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Moses, III
Defendant:
Central State University, Central State University Board of Trustees, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
