Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Brannan-Pierce et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11607
Plaintiff:
Megan Brannan-Pierce and Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2010cv00408
Petitioner:
Thomas Michael Pierce
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv11513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Fletcher et al v. Lupo et al
as 2:2008cv01844
Plaintiff:
Paul Fletcher and Kathy Fletcher
Defendant:
Damion Lupo, Dan Pena, Robert Park Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Miley et al v. Bogalusa City
as 2:2008cv04080
Plaintiff:
Clinton A. Miley, Jr., Clay Applewhite, Dean Borel and others
Defendant:
Bogalusa City
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pierce v. Accor Lodging North America d/b/a Motel 6
as 2:2007cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Pierce and Michael Pierce
Defendant:
Accor Lodging North America d/b/a Motel 6 and Accor Lodging North America d/b/a Motel 6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Campos v. Lockyer et al
as 2:2007cv01095
Plaintiff:
Roman P Campos
Defendant:
William Lockyer, Michael Boruff, Santa Clara District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
PIERCE et al v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER PIERCE, JENNIFER PIERCE, MICHAEL PIERCE and others
Defendant:
AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
