Cases 71 - 80 of 879,650
Heflin #483317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Heflin #483317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi E. Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heflin #483317 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D. Heflin #483317
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Myers et al v. Kem et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
William Myers and Jack Myers
Defendant:
Charles E. Kem, Nancy Rhode, David Bryan Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conte v. United States Office of Personnel Management
as 2:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Wayne D. Conte
Defendant:
United States Office of Personnel Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Star Nursery, Inc. v. Kahn
as 2:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Star Nursery, Inc.
Defendant:
Hafizur Kahn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EISENBREY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 3:2024cv06299
Plaintiff:
THERESA EISENBREY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP d/b/a WALMART, a business entity; JOHN DOES (1-20),, SHAW INDUSTRIES, INC.,, SHAW INDUSTRIES GROUP, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
