Cases 81 - 90 of 9,252
United States of America v. Denise Kim
as 2:2024cv02569
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Denise Kim
Garnishee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Bank of America and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Pierce v. Walmart Stores et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Walmart Stores and E Polack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Lubbock Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Alexander Eric Pierce
Defendant:
Lubbock Police Department, Jasmine Garcia, Jonathon J. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. USA
as 4:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Henry Pierce Payne
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Onda et al v. The Humane Society for Tacoma and Pierce County
as 3:2024cv05234
Plaintiff:
Nichole Onda and Troy Onda
Defendant:
The Humane Society for Tacoma and Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Hall v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Mikal Hall
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Latoya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
