Cases 81 - 90 of 152
Hayes v. CHC Medical et al
as 3:2013cv08272
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Hayes
Defendant:
CHC Medical, Arshad Tariq and Paul Bosseler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Arshad et al
as 6:2013cv01794
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Bobby Arshad, Larry Edwards and Roya, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Ward v. Robertson et al
as 4:2013cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Ward
Defendant:
Jeffrey Robertson, Arshad Tariq, Correctional Healthcare Companies Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Shah v. U. S. Federal Government et al
as 1:2013cv01952
Plaintiff:
Sadiah Jabeen Shah
Defendant:
U. S. Federal Government, All Other Governments of the World, Michael C. Lawrence and others
Naeem v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv03215
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Robert Louis Smith
Plaintiff:
Arshad Naeem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Anwar et al v. Executive Transportation Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02666
Plaintiff:
Muhammad N. Mustafa, Shahzad Qureshi, Khurram S. Cheena and others
Defendant:
Bell Radio, Inc., Avalon Corporate Car, Inc., U.S.A. Limo, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Ghazi Elreda, Rurik Meurs and Muhammed Akhtar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Khan v. Holder
as 13-1135
Petitioner:
Muhammad Arshad Khan
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
