Cases 81 - 90 of 16,729
Fuentes v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv21518
Plaintiff:
Miguel Galan Fuentes
Defendant:
Molly Jane Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Act
Washington et al v. Just Ice Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Campbell Washington, RockSteady Industries International LLC doing business as RSZ Media, RockSteady Recordz and others
Defendant:
Just Ice Campbell, Judges Ben Darvil, Jr., Diana Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Campbell (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Edward H. Campbell
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Alston Campbell, Sr.
as 24-1813
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alston Ray Campbell, Sr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ervin v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jackie Darrell Ervin
Defendant:
Brandon Barnes, Jamison Marriman, Dillian Seibers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alpha Insulation & Waterproofing, Inc. v. Campbell et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Alpha Insulation & Waterproofing, Inc.
Defendant:
Lee Campbell, Specialty Spray Systems, Inc. and Registered Agent Kimberly Gauger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 5:2024cv11028
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Jones
Defendant:
S. Campbell and J. Bush
Larry Wangerow v. Brian Porter
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
LARRY WILLIAM WANGEROW
Defendant:
BRIAN PORTER, CLARA E. CAMPBELL, Admin. Officer "CLECA", BONNIE G. SCHNEIDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
