Cases 81 - 90 of 210
Randy Hart v. Assistant Warden, et al
as 18-12781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY A. HART
Defendant - Appellee:
ASSISTANT WARDEN, LACEY CAPLE, JR., SHANIQUE THOMAS, Officer and others
Caples v. Wachtendorf et al
as 4:2018cv00214
Plaintiff:
Montez Caples
Defendant:
Michelle Waddle, Mike Schierbrock, Charles Marmer and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caples v. Menzies Aviation (USA), Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv05765
Plaintiff:
Carissa Caples
Defendant:
Bryce Wolfe and Menzies Aviation USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Milie et al v. City of Savannah
as 4:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert Milie , Terry Alberts, Jr. , Matthew Caples and others
Defendant:
City of Savannah
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 1:2018cv01070
Plaintiff:
Edward Czapla, Nathan Ownby, Rita Westcott and others
Defendant:
UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., The 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Caroscio v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00827
Plaintiff:
Tracy Caroscio
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A, Inc., Josh Cruz and Chris Caples
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Evick v. Caple et al
as 1:2018cv00395
Petitioner:
Christiana Evick
Respondent:
Wendi Caple and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. St. Louis Community College et al
as 4:2018cv00272
Plaintiff:
Steven Taylor
Defendant:
St. Louis Community College , Rodney Gee and Robert Caples
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00204
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
