Cases 81 - 90 of 580
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Oklahoma State of et al v. Biden et al
as 5:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin J Stitt and John M OConnor
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Bartels et al
as 5:2021cv01068
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amy Bartels, David Batton Law, Washington Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
City of DuPont v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv03284
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ester Bullock v. Frank Kendall
as 21-2111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESTER BULLOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANK KENDALL, Secretary, Department of the Air Force
City of DuPont v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv05702
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of DuPont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WP COMPANY LLC v. U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE et al
as 1:2021cv02458
Plaintiff:
WP COMPANY LLC doing business as WASHINGTON POST
Defendant:
U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Oram v. Air Force
as 21-2307
Petitioner:
CYRIL DAVID DANIEL ORAM, JR.
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Geico Casualty Insurance v. Department of the Air Force
as 2:2021cv00604
Plaintiff:
Geico Casualty Insurance
Defendant:
Department of the Air Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lagrange v. Department of the Air Force
as 3:2021cv01742
Petitioner:
Shawn M. Lagrange
Respondent:
Department of the Air Force
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
