Cases 81 - 90 of 251
Burden v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08549
Plaintiff:
Debi Burden
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Debi McKinney v. Carlton Manor Nursing, et al
as 16-3895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBI MCKINNEY, on behlf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
CARLTON MANOR NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., et al
Defendant - Appellee:
SOVRAN MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC
RSDC Holdings, LLC v. Steinberg et al
as 2:2016cv09381
Plaintiff:
RSDC Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Ron Steinberg, Ganis Credit Corporation and debis Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
v. debis Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08749
Defendant:
debis Financial Services, Inc., Ganis Credit Corporation and Ron Steinberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lamb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv01227
Plaintiff:
Debi Jean Lamb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lamb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016at00674
Plaintiff:
Debi Jean Lamb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. et al v. City of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2016cv02072
Plaintiff:
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. and Andrew DeFaria
Defendant:
City of Santa Clara , Lisa Gillmor, Teresa O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Mara et al v Albers et al
as 4:2016cv00476
Plaintiff:
John O'Mara , Mike O'Laughlin , Mark Collom and others
Defendant:
Thomas W Albers and Debi Albers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Debi Stevens v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01774
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Debi Stevens
Jones v. Forbes et al
as 3:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Gerald Gonye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
