Cases 81 - 90 of 140
AIRCRAFT CHARTER SOLUTIONS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
AIRCRAFT CHARTER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
McClung v. Dyncorp International LLC
as 6:2012cv00953
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jerome McClung
Defendant:
Dyncorp International LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv03267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Projects Management Company v. DynCorp International LLC
as 12-2241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROJECTS MANAGEMENT COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC
Projects Management Company v. DynCorp International LLC
as 2:2012mc02655
Plaintiff:
Projects Management Company
Defendant:
DynCorp International LLC
Movant:
Craig Hymowitz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Salser et al v. Dyncorp International, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv10960
Plaintiff:
Patricia Salser , Brandin Pope , Kevin Pope, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Dyncorp International, Inc., Dyncorp International, LLC, Kyle Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CONTRACTING, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING LLC v. USA
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
CONTRACTING, CONSULTING, ENGINEERING LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. DynCorp International et al
as 3:2011cv00714
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Bailey
Defendant:
DynCorp International, FZ-LLC and DynCorp International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
