Cases 81 - 90 of 11,891
Peterson v. Othmer et al
as 2:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Ali Aziz and Mark Peterson
Defendant:
Ms Gleen, Dionna Clemmons, Niel L Thoreson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi, John Does 1-10, Wanda Evers and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shelby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, III v. Road Runners Transport Dynasty, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00940
Defendant:
Road Runners Transport Dynasty, LLC and Tyree Graham
Plaintiff:
Johnny Jones, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 24-3114
Defendant:
TWIN CITIES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. EDWARD PROSTIC, DR. STEPHEN NOLKER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Sullivan v. Graham, Jr., et al
as 24-3113
Defendant:
STEVEN G. PILAND, TIM ELLIOT, ELLIOT LAW FIRM and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Graham v. Butcher
as 3:2024cv01317
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Dove Anna Graham
Defendant:
Carmen Lynn Butcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Graham
as 2:2024cv12113
Defendant:
Karen Graham
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Graham Packaging Company, L.P. v. Ring Container Technologies, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Graham Packaging Company, L.P.
Respondent:
Murali K. Akkapeddi
Defendant:
Ring Container Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: FRCP 37(a) Motion to compel deposition testimony
Graham v. Butcher
as 3:2024cv01318
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Dove Anna Graham
Defendant:
Bryan Lynn Butcher, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Graham v. Terry Family Funeral Home
as 3:2024cv01319
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Dove Anna Graham
Defendant:
Terry Family Funeral Home
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
