Cases 81 - 90 of 119
Mark Baker v. The Hecker Law Group et al
as 2:2010cv02369
Plaintiff:
Mark Baker
Defendant:
Daniel C Cotman, Dalina Law Group, Does and others
BREELAND v. BAKER
as 1:2010cv00070
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BREELAND
Defendant:
MARK BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HARRIS v. BELL et al
as 2:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
JORGE HARRIS
Defendant:
BELL, MARK BAKER, FELIPE A. ARIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Beck et al
as 3:2010cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jean Davis
Defendant:
Daniel W. Beck, John E Allen, John E Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. BELL et al
as 2:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
JORGE HARRIS
Defendant:
BELL, MARK BAKER, FELIPE A. ARIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 4:2009cv04915
Plaintiff:
Mark Baker, Mark Baker, Mark Baker and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Blodgett v. Caspers et al
as 1:2009cv00144
Plaintiff:
Ricky Joe Blodgett
Defendant:
Randy Caspers, Major Mayo, Jake Noonan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jessica Hankey v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 09-3675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA HANKEY, Individually and as Administratix of the Estate of Ryan Rohrbaugh
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and MARK BAKER, Doctor
Defendant - Non-Participating:
PRISON HEALTH SER INC, ALAN ESPER and O'LEARY
BURKE v. BAKER, et al
as 1:2009cv00212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BURKE
Defendant:
MARK BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
