Cases 81 - 90 of 292
Smith v. Paypal, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03321
Plaintiff:
Jessica Smith
Defendant:
Paypal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PayPal, Inc. vs RetailMeNot, Inc
as 6:2020cv00339
Plaintiff:
PayPal, Inc.
Defendant:
RetailMeNot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC v. Paypal Inc.
as 1:2020cv00404
Plaintiff:
Honeyman Cipher Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Paypal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
United States of America v. one 2014 Rolls Royce bearing VIN# SCA665C50EUX84748 et al
as 6:2020cv06248
Defendant:
$100,000 FROM PAYPAL INC. AS SUBSTITUTE RES FOR PAYPAL ACCOUNT ENDING #4206 REGISTERED TO DEVIN TRIBUNELLA, ONE 2014 MERCEDES BENZ BEARING VIN# WDCYC7DF8EX215569, ONE 14K 2ct. DIAMOND TENNIS BRACELET SEIZED FROM TOWER 280, APARTMENT 1604, 280 EAST BROAD STREET, ROCHESTER, NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution, et al
as 20-1059
Defendant / Appellee:
HORUS MUSIC VIDEO DISTRIBUTION, TIDAL, PAYPAL, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Amro Elansari v. Shay Ramirez, et al
as 20-1079
Defendant:
SHAY O. RAMIREZ, OFFICER RILEY, (INDV. CAPACITY), PAYPAL INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMRO A. ELANSARI
ELANSARI v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2019cv06198
Defendant:
SHAY O. RAMIREZ, PAYPAL INC., LT CARROL and others
Plaintiff:
AMRO ELANSARI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
PAYPAL, INC. v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU et al
as 1:2019cv03700
Plaintiff:
PAYPAL, INC.
Defendant:
KATHY KRANINGER and CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
