Cases 81 - 90 of 155
Johnson v. Siliunas et al
as 2:2014cv01408
Defendant:
Mindas V Siliunas, Larry Sprung, A. Khaze and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd N Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Barrack v. Officer S. Rimmer et al
as 8:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
Joseph Barrack
Defendant:
City of Costa Mesa, Commander/Chief, Costa Mesa Police Department and others
Rimmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Carol N. Rimmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rimmer v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01355
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Beverly Rimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
RIMMER v. NICHOLS et al
as 3:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
LOUIS ODELL RIMMER
Defendant:
M NICHOLS, D MCGOWAN and W D RUMMEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durbin et al v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Anthony Durbin, Christina Durbin, David Timms and others
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, John Rimmer, Dana Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cristobal Hernandez, Jr. v. Janice Brewer, et al
as 13-16826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRISTOBAL HERNANDEZ, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE K. BREWER, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her official capacity, THOMAS C. HORNE, Arizona Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Rimmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2013cv00719
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rimmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daniel Rouster v. Saginaw County, et al
as 13-1673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROUSTER, PR
Defendant:
SAGINAW COUNTY, ALVIN RIMMER, Shift Commander, MICHAEL VANHORN, Officer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SECURE CARE, INCORPORATED, CATHLEEN CONLEY, RMA, STELLA MENCHACA, LPN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
