Cases 81 - 90 of 2,704
Rutherford v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Janet Leigh Rutherford
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(PC) Nitkin v. Radu et al
as 2:2023cv01837
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Nitkin
Defendant:
D. Radu and Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kyle Rutherford
as 23-3704
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KYLE RUTHERFORD
Mollie Slaybaugh, et al v. Rutherford County, TN, et al
as 23-5765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOLLIE SLAYBAUGH and MICHAEL SLAYBAUGH
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTHERFORD COUNTY, TN, RUTHERFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and TOWN OF SMYRNA, TN
RUTHERFORD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09390
Plaintiff:
MARTHA RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jacobs v Rutherford County
as 3:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
Taylor Ross Jacobs
Defendant:
Rutherford County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McComas et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clayton Jones and Clay Jones
Defendant:
Joseph McComas and Rutherford County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saye Gofan, Jr. v. Cameron Gustafson, et al
as 23-2817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Saye Henry Gofan, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Cameron C. Gustafson, Ryan Olson, William Aldrich and others
Scales et al v. Awad et al
as 3:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
Shyricka Scales, Ivary Scales and Kencharries Scales
Defendant:
Mina Awad, Mark Anderson and Rutherford County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
