Cases 81 - 90 of 381
Davis v. Sansei, Inc.
as 1:2019cv11195
Defendant:
Sansei, Inc. d/b/a Health Street and Sansei, Inc
Plaintiff:
Dontae T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Walker v. Forte et al
as 5:2019cv00158
Respondent:
Major Garth Parker, Brandon K Pollock, Sandra Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Renard Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Davis v. A. Molina, et al
as 19-17411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES T. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, A. MOLINA and S. HOSMAN
SHEPHERD v. HTD CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE, HENRY T. DAVIS, HTD CONSULTING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phedrek DavisIn re: Phedrek Davis
as 19-6205
Petitioner:
In re: PHEDREK T. DAVIS
Respondent:
KEVIN GENOVESE, Warden
Davis v. City of New York
as 19-3268
Defendant:
New York City Transit Authority, MTA Bus Company, Metropolitan Transit Authority and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Police Officer Junior J. Walters, Shield #14810, City of New York and Police Officer Wanda Gowins, Shield #02967
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rahiem T. Davis
Aberha v. Director Nevada Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00606
Defendant:
Director Nevada Dept of Corrections, Gittere, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Ashenafi G Aberha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
as 3:2019cv02152
Plaintiff:
Jamie T Davis
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barclays Bank Delaware v. Davis
as 5:2019cv00763
Defendant:
Shawn T Davis
Plaintiff:
Barclays Bank Delware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 8:2019cv02075
Defendant:
Brian P Sterling, Phyllis Hopkins, Doctor T Burns and others
Plaintiff:
William Tyrone Davis and William T Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
