Cases 81 - 90 of 169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv00673
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS O. STEPHENS
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, BRIAN PORCHER, SUSAN FORTNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. JOHNSON
as 1:2014cv00645
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DUANE BROWN
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEPHENS v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv00588
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS O. STEPHENS
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS MEDICAL STAFF, SUSAN FORTEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ISHRAT v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-KHALIG ISHRAT
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, SUZANNE FORTNER, JO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bobby Jones, et al v. USDC-CALA
as 14-70035
:
In re: BOBBY JONES, RAYMON CHADWICK, TERRY JOHNSON and others
Petitioner:
BOBBY JONES, RAYMON CHADWICK, TERRY JOHNSON and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bobby Jones et al
as 2:2013cv08314
Respondent:
Raymon Chadwick, Expectrum LLC, Innovative Group and others
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
BARNES et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05851
Plaintiff:
RENETTA BARNES , JANICE BISCHOFF , JIMMIE LEE CLEVELAND and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 4:2013cv02766
Plaintiff:
Terry Johnson
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
