Cases 81 - 90 of 153
Cillitto v. Bergami
as 3:2019cv00216
Respondent:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Thomas Bergami
Petitioner:
Tony Edward Cillitto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Staunton v. Harrington et al
as 1:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Trans Core of America, Department of Public Safety, State of Hawaii, Core Civic of America and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Louis Leona Staunton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Golson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00486
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Warden Thomas, Co. Officer Young and others
Plaintiff:
Prince Sayon Lenard Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Thomas et al
as 1:2019cv00360
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Monalisa Pule, Warden Ben Griego and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fussa v. Moyer et al
as 1:2019cv01888
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Kitchen, D. Corcoron and others
Plaintiff:
Hector Fussa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Douglas Jackson v. Berean, et al
as 19-1583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, DEPUTY WARDEN THOMAS, QUARTERMASTER J. HENSLEY and others
Billy Melot v. Thomas Bergami
as 19-50436
Petitioner / Appellant:
BILLY R. MELOT
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN THOMAS E. BERGAMI
Bell v. Bergami
as 3:2019cv00108
Petitioner:
William Richard Bell
Defendant:
Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Melot v. Bergami
as 3:2019cv00104
Respondent:
Warden Thomas E. Bergami
Petitioner:
Billy R. Melot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blagmon v. Meyer
as 3:2019cv00245
Petitioner:
Darnell Bernard Blagmon
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
