Cases 81 - 90 of 208
Williams v. Dahl
as 3:2017cv00461
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Defendant:
M. Dahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00012
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Smith
Petitioner:
Willie William Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02996
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walston v. J.D. Gaffney's Funeral Home Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06354
Defendant:
Jeremiah Gaffney, Dr. Doreathea Gaffney, M.D., J.D. Gaffney's Funeral Home Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brinson Walston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Walston et al v. J.D. Gaffney's Funeral Home Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06354
Plaintiff:
Gaffney Doreathea, Brinson Walston and Willie Williams
Defendant:
Jeremiah Gaffney and J.D. Gaffney's Funeral Home Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Williams v. Dahl
as 3:2016cv05880
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams
Defendant:
M. Dahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILLIAMS v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2016cv05930
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ROBINSON and CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA et al v. RUCHO et al
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA , WILLIAM COLLINS , ELLIOTT FELDMAN and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. RUCHO , DAVID R. LEWIS , TIMOTHY K. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. W. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00671
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Hranday W., Shontavious Smith, H. Witrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
