Cases 81 - 90 of 124
Willliams v. Department of Corrections
as 9:2013cv80693
Plaintiff:
Lamatra M Willliams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willliams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv20275
Plaintiff:
Barbara Willliams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willliams v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-20275
Plaintiff:
Barbara Willliams
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Nabaya v. Stark
as 3:2013cv00218
Plaintiff:
Shapat A. Nabaya
Defendant:
Willliam Stark
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Thomas Williams v. K. Edenfield, et al
as 13-10152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LEE WILLLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. EDENFIELD, Warden, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JONES V LATTIMER, ET AL
as 1:2012cv02050
Plaintiff:
MABLE JONES
Defendant:
GREGORY L. LATTIMER and TED J. WILLLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
John Noel, et al v. HCC Insurance Holdings, Incorp
as 12-2900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NOEL, TYLER NOEL, BETSY BROUGHER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED
Willliams v. Techtronic Industries of North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv11502
Plaintiff:
Craig Willliams
Defendant:
Techtronic Industries of North America, Inc. , Ryobi North America and Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schroeder v. Diamond Parking, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Eric Schroeder
Defendant:
Diamond Parking, Inc., Diamond Parking Services, LLC, Parking Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
