Cases 41 - 50 of 202,374
MIDDLETON v. DAVID et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
JASON MIDDLETON
Defendant:
DAVID and MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Druhan v. ABC et al
as 1:2024cv11306
Plaintiff:
Robert Druhan
Defendant:
ABC and ABC Nightly News with David Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trupia v. Heritage Hard Assets LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Anthony Trupia
Defendant:
Heritage Hard Assets LLC, Kyle Patton, HLV Ventures and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Little v. McDaniel
as 0:2024cv03044
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Little, Jr
Defendant:
Eric McDaniel and Florence County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-1304
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 24-1311
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Taylor v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3114
Petitioner:
CAMERON LEEZELL TAYLOR
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, KRIS MAYES, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, ADOC Director and others
Bennett v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3119
Petitioner:
DAVID BENNETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
MONROE DETENTION CENTER, YOLO COUNTY JAIL, WELL PATH DIRECTOR and others
David Reed v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1434
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLAN REED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Genesee County Sheriff and BRIAN D. MACMILLAN, Sr. Asst. Pros Atty/FOIA Coordinator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
