Cases 21 - 30 of 1,213
Adair v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jessica Adair
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Smith v. Beverage et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Cody L. Smith
Defendant:
Steve Beverage, Sr., Kelsey Speed, Angla Kolker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyer Automotive, Inc. v. Kolterman et al
as 4:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Meyer Automotive, Inc.
Defendant:
Jessica Kolterman, Brian Peters, John Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldsmith v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Jessica Leann Goldsmith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Otte v. Fussleman et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Mike Fussleman, Jessica Tagg, Aleix Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daywitt v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Douglas Latuseck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langston v. Coggins Rental LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Jessica Langston
Defendant:
Coggins Rental LLC and Dennis Coggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Hearn v. Caldwell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv06009
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hearn
Defendant:
Caldwell County Detention Center, Smith, Caldwell County Detention Center Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
