Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Pino v. BIA Law Enforcement Mescalero Agency et al
as 1:2018cv00759
Plaintiff:
Bennie Pino
Defendant:
BIA Law Enforcement Mescalero Agency, FNU Jackson and T Decker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Wendell D. Isaac
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunham v. Zanders et al
as 3:2018cv00018
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lamar Dunham
Defendant:
Sam Zanders, Tina Sanders, FNU Inman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman (ID 65738) v. Norwood et al
as 5:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Brinkman
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Kansas Department of Corrections, Douglas Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenyon et al v. Branch et al
as 1:2017cv00351
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Celeste Kenyon and Tammy McAbee
Defendant:
Jimmy Lee Branch, FNU Jackson, North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
John Cockerham v. Jackson, et al
as 17-51123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN COCKERHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU JACKSON, Warden of GEO Operation, FNU POPPEL, Warden of Administration and MAJOR FNU VEGA, GEO Supervisor and Manager
Gill v. Clarke et al
as 3:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Gill
Defendant:
R. Clarke, R. A. Everette, A. Ellison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Porter et al
as 6:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Garrin David Smith
Defendant:
D Porter, W Mann, J F Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loften v. Paton et al
as 5:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
James E Loften
Defendant:
Ken Paton, Edward L Marshall, Casey Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loften v. Paton et al
as 1:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
James E Loften
Defendant:
Ken Paton, Edward L Marshall, Casey Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
