Cases 11 - 20 of 3,021
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Jeton Lita/Simon Bolivar Express Trust
Defendant:
Brad C. Calhoun, Teachers Federal Credit Union, Timothy M. Southerton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Belk Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Lisa Calhoun
Defendant:
Belk Inc and Riverchase Galleria LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Behovitz et al v. Barry, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Brian Behovitz, George Brunette, Michael Burns and others
Defendant:
Barry, County of, Susan VandeCar, Muskegon, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Vines v. Calhoun County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
George Taylor Carl Vines
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff Department and Steven Hinkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abernathy v. City Of Cincinnati
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Paulette Abernathy
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati and Robin Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hampton v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jarivs Jerome Hampton, Jr.
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Coosa River Basin Initiative v. City of Calhoun, Georgia et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Coosa River Basin Initiative
Defendant:
City of Calhoun, Georgia and Moss Land Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
