Cases 1 - 10 of 519
Cooney v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Chad Wilson, Matthew Tucker and Kelton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cooney v. Alvey et al
as 4:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Billy Alvey, Carl Boyce, Brady Knuckles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windsor v. Pepperman et al
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William Michael Windsor
Defendant:
Judge Carla R. Pepperman, Emily Curington and Gary Cooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krishonn Cooney v. Brady Knuckles
as 24-1898
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles, State Trooper, Arkansas State Police
Cooney v. Knuckles
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Tyrone Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Pamela Michele Cooney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Neal et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Harris
Defendant:
Monique Neal, Jocelyn Cooney, Jaymie Parkhurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooney v. Schachter et al
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
James Cooney
Defendant:
M.D. Aaron Schachter, Connecticut Orthopaedic Specialists, P.C., d/b/a Connecticut Orthopaedics, Aaron Schachter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Cooney v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Joyce Cooney
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
