Cases 1 - 10 of 2,645
McCall v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
KERRY MCCALL
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Shanena McCall
as 24-4276
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHANENA INEZ MCCALL, a/k/a Chubbs
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston, Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Texas at Dallas and Democratic Socialists of America
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, University of Houston, University of Houston System Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCall v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01776
Plaintiff:
Richard McCall
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
McCall v. United States of America
as 1:2024mi00036
Plaintiff:
Bondary McCall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
McCall v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03364
Plaintiff:
Kerry McCall
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McCall v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
Elijah McCall
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Everett v. McCall
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Steven Everett
Defendant:
Wyatt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Clarence McCall
as 24-11176
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CLARENCE ANTHONY MCCALL
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
