Cases 31 - 40 of 1,201
Rodrigues v. Transdev U.S., Inc.
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rodrigues
Defendant:
Transdev U.S., Inc. Doing business as Transdev Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Mason v. Rodrigue et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rochon Lee Mason
Defendant:
Don Paul rodrique, Dupre Marine Transportation, LLC, Don Paul Rodrigue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mason v. Rodrigue et al
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rochon Lee Mason
Defendant:
Don Paul Rodrigue and Dupre Marine Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodrigues v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Nickelia Rodrigues
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Janson et al
as 2:2023cv06916
Plaintiff:
Patrick O'neal Harris
Defendant:
Warden S. Janson, Officer P. Davis, R&D Officer Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodrigues Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4371
Petitioner:
AMANDA RODRIGUES SILVA, RICARDO ALVES DE PAULA and SAMILLY VITORIA ALVES DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
De Oliveira Rodrigues, et al v. Garland
as 23-2081
Petitioner:
JOZELIA MARIA DE OLIVEIRA RODRIGUES and E.C.D.O.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00603
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
