Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Nichols v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2026cv00564
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Sanders, Tim Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anglin v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01485
Plaintiff:
John Anglin
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Toussaint v. Montefiore Health System, Inc.
as 26-2912
Defendant:
VNSW COMMUNITY CARE NAVIGATION, INC., MONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL TOUSSAINT, ESTE PALLAS, TRUDY SHERMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Valdez v. Brandonburg et al
as 4:2026cv10164
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene Valdez
Defendant:
Sean Brandonburg and Anna J. Anglin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAVIS v. BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE J DAVIS
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, TOMMY FORD, RICK ANGLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natasha Proctor v. Willa Hamer
as 26-1985
Plaintiff:
NATASHA PROCTOR
Defendant:
WILLA HAMER, CAPOOL LARRY, OFFICER HODGE and others
FITTS v. FORD et al
as 5:2026cv00182
Respondent:
TOMMY FORD and RICK ANGLIN
Petitioner:
COLBY BLAKE FITTS
Trustee:
KAYLA-NICOLE: HOUSE OF FITTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
QCX LLC v. Ellison et al
as 0:2026cv02841
Plaintiff:
QCX LLC doing business as Polymarket US
Defendant:
Keith Ellison, Tim Walz and Jon Anglin
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
