Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Angel Deal Syndicate, LLC v. TECSO Charge Zone Limited
as 1:2026cv02071
Plaintiff:
Angel Deal Syndicate, LLC
Defendant:
TECSO Charge Zone Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Deals #275557 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2026cv05231
Petitioner:
Robert Deals
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Deal v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2026cv03896
Plaintiff:
Ricco Deal, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and General Counsel Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
DEAL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2026cv01313
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEAL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
DEAL v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2026cv01461
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DEAL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Deal Rise, LLC v. Mango Power Tech Inc.
as 0:2026cv03169
Plaintiff:
Deal Rise, LLC
Defendant:
Mango Power Tech Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Deal v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2026cv00221
Plaintiff:
Amy Deal
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Deal Rise v. Mango Power Tech Inc.
as 0:2026cv03150
Plaintiff:
Deal Rise
Defendant:
Mango Power Tech Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Deal et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2026cv00751
Plaintiff:
Alexis Deal and Sloan Deal
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
