Cases 1 - 10 of 161
CHATMAN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT CHATMAN, DAJUNT PORTER, LASHAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE NORMAN LOCKE, OFFICER KIRK KOTCHIG, DAVID REICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Morgan County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Justin Fuqua
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail and Trent McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08621
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malik Fuqua v. USA
as 23-1710
Petitioner / Appellant:
MALIK FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
FUQUA v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
DARRELL FUQUA
Respondent:
S. KALLIS and T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FUQUA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
DEREK FUQUA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuqua v. Titus
as 6:2022cv06490
Petitioner:
Wendell Fuqua
Respondent:
Amy Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
