Cases 1 - 10 of 3,959
Dhaman Gill v. 23andMe, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Dhaman Gill
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Garces v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-3166
Plaintiff:
LUIS MANUEL GARCES
Defendant:
M. GAMBOA, KERN KLARK, D. HERNANDEZ and others
Joseph Lento, et al v. Keith Altman, et al
as 24-1899
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LENTO, an individual and LENTO LAW FIRM LLC, a limited liability company
Defendant:
KEITH L. ALTMAN, an individual, LAW OFFICE OF KEITH ALTMAN PLLC, a/k/a K Altman Law, a limited liability company, ARI KRESCH, an individual and others
USA v. Gill
as 2:2024mc50465
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jagrant Singh Gill
Petitioner:
Ms. Kirandeep Gill
Eason v. Gill-Bloyer et al
as 1:2024cv03849
Defendant:
LFW Inc., Jason Gill-Bloyer, Rashoan Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Eason LaTonya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Gill v. Whatnot, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Gill
Defendant:
Whatnot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gill v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65422
Plaintiff:
Symboii Gill
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hillman v. Gill et al.
as 3:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon John Hillman
Defendant:
Joseph N. Gill, Tayler Glass, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gill v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03475
Plaintiff:
Henry B Gill, Jr.
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Sgt. Valadez, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
