Cases 1 - 10 of 5,369
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Pearson v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv03354
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Havens v. Chapa et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Amando Chapa, Corporal Fincher, Appel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Washington
as 2:2024cv11179
Petitioner:
Andre DeShawn Pearson
Respondent:
Michigan, People of the State of and Raphael Washington
Pearson, Dennis v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Dennis E. Pearson, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. City of New York
as 24-1167
Plaintiff:
LESTER PEARSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DARCEL CLARK, Bronx County District Attorney; In His Personal Capacity and others
Reo Covington v. William Chronister, et al
as 24-1906
Plaintiff:
Reo L. Covington
Defendant:
William Chronister, Dardenelle Police Officer, Does, 1-4, Dardenelle Police Officers, Pearson's Towing & Recovery Services LLC, Towing Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Oregon Health & Science University et al
as 3:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Maureen E. Baker
Defendant:
Oregon Health & Science University, Rodney F. Pommier, Glenn I. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
