Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cruz v. Moon et al
as 2:2026cv01323
Plaintiff:
Debra Jean Cruz
Defendant:
Mark Moon and Detective D McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Condron et al
as 1:2026cv02906
Plaintiff:
Dominic D. Miller
Defendant:
Ben Condron, A. Taylor, Charlotte Mecklenburg, NC Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04518
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tillman v. Gamache et al
as 1:2026cv01528
Plaintiff:
Garrien F. Tillman
Defendant:
Scott Gamache, City of Niagara Falls, Detective David Wylucki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Carlassare et al
as 1:2026cv08855
Plaintiff:
Garryl Willis
Defendant:
John Carlassare, Detective Lorenzo Sandoval and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pugh v. LAVERTY et al
as 2:2026cv05142
Plaintiff:
Jessica Pugh
Defendant:
DETECTIVE MICHAEL LAVERTY, TROOPER RYAN TIERNEY, Libby Hemler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flores v. Zeigman et al
as 1:2026cv08757
Plaintiff:
Evaleena Flores
Defendant:
Detective Zeigman and Max Shreffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trudeau v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2026cv01475
Plaintiff:
Alan J. Trudeau
Defendant:
Detective Marc O'Connor, Deputy J. Malkoski, Annissa M. Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Denmon v. Paz
as 26-50603
Plaintiff:
Kevin Art Denmon
Defendant:
Officer FNU Paz and Detective Russell Constable
PORTER v HUNTER SARVER et al
as 2:2026cv01541
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT PORTER
Defendant:
SGT HUNTER SARVER, SGT ANDRESIK, SGT JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
