Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. One (1) 2023 Toyota Camry et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One (1) 2023 Toyota Camry, One (1) 2023 Kayo KMB 60 Motorcycle, One (1) 2023 Honda Grom Motorcycle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $33,546.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY et al
as 4:2017cv00170
Defendant:
$33,546.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY and FIVE (5) FIREARMS WITH ASSORTED ROUNDS OF AMMUNITION
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Five (5) Firearms Seized from Dustin Anglin on March 17, 2017, in Youngstown, Ohio
as 4:2017cv01735
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Five (5) Firearms Seized from Dustin Anglin on March 17, 2017, in Youngstown, Ohio
Interested_party:
Dustin Anglin and Jordan Peshek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. $167,147.27 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$167,147.27 in United States Currency, One German Sports Guns GSG-5 firearm, .22 caliber, Serial No. A340816, One Glock Model 23 firearm, .40 caliber, Serial No. SFU885 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $23,502 in U.S. Currency, 5 Firearms, and 54 Assorted Collector Coins and Metals et al
as 0:2014mc00012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$23,502 in U.S. Currency, 5 Firearms, and 54 Assorted Collector Coins and Metals
Claimant:
James Pedersen
Type:
Other Statutes
United States v. 5 Firearms
as 2:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
5 Firearms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341
United States of America v. Five (5) Firearms
as 1:2008cv01162
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Five (5) Firearms
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
