Cases 31 - 40 of 2,106
Stewart et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
James Stewart, Curtis James Walker, Corey Michael Walker and others
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation n/k/a Amtrak, Jennifer M. Harvey and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 rs Fed. Question: Federal Rail Safety Act
Broadhead Operating, LLC v. Harris Massey Herinckx, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00462
Defendant:
Broadhead Operating, LLC, Harris Massey Herinckx, Inc. (n/k/a bubblegum Factory, Inc), Edward Herinckx and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wolfe v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Stanley N. Wolfe
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc., 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Fisher v. N & R of New Madrid, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fisher
Defendant:
N & R of New Madrid, LLC and Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Fisher v. N & R of New Madrid, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fisher
Defendant:
N & R of New Madrid, LLC and Health Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Doe 1 et al
as 8:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
RaySean Barber
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
