Cases 1 - 10 of 435
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1167
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Aguilera Diaz et al v. Svihel et al
as 0:2024cv01483
Plaintiff:
Allan Juseth Aguilera Diaz, Nahun Alexander Barahona Amador, Jerson Ariel Betanco Flores and others
Defendant:
John J. Svihel and Svihel Vegetable Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595 Civil Remedies: Human Trafficking
Boon #360273 v. Lake Havasu City, City of et al
as 3:2024cv08041
Plaintiff:
Jason Boon
Defendant:
Lake Havasu City, City of, Joshua Banuelos, Kial Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez-Banuelos v. Garland
as 24-807
Petitioner:
JULIA HERNANDEZ-BANUELOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Banuelos v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
Luis Banuelos
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Medina et al v. Monterey County et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Nathan Medina, Claudia Maravillo, Matthew Medina, Jr. and others
Defendant:
County of Monterey, Tina Nieto, Sergeant Garrett Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banuelos v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
Juan Banuelos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30902 to 30911 Suits in Admiralty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tyler v. Banuelos
as 3:2023cv02213
Plaintiff:
Claudie Tyler
Defendant:
Banuelos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
